Maschinen
Tractate
If there
was ever a book that would turn me into an old man this is it. I
have spent thousands of hours combing through this book and its
descriptions.
Like
most of Bessler's stuff this book talks mostly about the two-way
wheel with some snippets of the one-way wheel.
After
looking at the drawings for a while patterns began to emerge.
All most too many patterns. There is the tens series where each
decade drawing (10,20,30...) seems to have been laid out ahead of
time. When you get into the teen numbered drawings they seem to be
repeated when you add ten or twenty and so on. Then pairs and groups
of drawings started making more sense as being connected together or
a differential comparisions of the two wheels that reverse and
flip-flop who's first. Other groups
of two or three drawings seem to be focused on one particular wheel.
The wobbly weight ladder group, the signature pendulum weight group, etc., etc.
There is another small set of drawings that have Bessler's other
signature mark the combined NB as mentioned in the Measuring page.
The beginning of the leading paragraph in this book and
drawings eighty-one, and ninety-six. There is also what looks like
hand written marks that could be additional NB's in drawings
seventy-three, seventy-four, and one hundred and three. In the final
category of drawings he seemed to just be having fun with unrealistic
or fanciful Rube Goldberg devices.
The following
is my attempt to interpret what Bessler was trying to say for each drawing.
On the
first page of the actual book Bessler declares the solution to his
wheels are within these pages. No figure by itself contains the
motion but by combining certain figures, a movement can be found.
through
8. hold little importance because they are mostly just describing
what won't work. There are a few things scattered here and there
that could be called initial hints.
Here
Bessler points out that ball weights are of no use in seeking
perpetual motion. He then goes on to say what will work is weighted
arms that are interconnected. I also find it fascinating that
Bessler kicks off actually talking about something important till
this specific number. It may have to do with Hebrew form of
numerology or it could be his way of trying to make things a bit
more confusing.
The
first of the decades. Arms should be long and curved presumably to
position the weight where it could otherwise not go. Later he will
depict this figure differently and show the “correct handle
construction”.
The
double rows of weights are important but in a different
configuration to be revealed in an unspecified place.
The
guide at the lower left demonstrates the effect to be sought on the
wheel. This could be a reference to twins number 24 latch and lock.
Causes the wheel to shake a great deal comment is interesting as it
may indicate that a greater portion of the push power comes from the
lower weight than the top one.
This
is one of about twenty wheels that rotate counter clockwise and with
thirteen being a dubious number Bessler may have made it backwards
for a reversal of bad luck. When the weight above is to be lifted
it should be snapped up quite quickly.
This
drawing introduces the first of several drawings that show two
weights on opposite sides of the wheel being lifting straight up at
the same time. Bessler finally tells us where to look for his best
clues about the wheel, in the end of the book.
This
drawing shows the effective overbalance of the running two-way wheel
with the outer most ring of weights. These weights slide in and out
with no lateral movement and are like the stampers from the twins
and Prima in some respects. The weight at the very top 12 o'clock position is
rectangular like a hammer head to make it stand out. The prime mover
mentioned is assumed to be the weight(s) that must fall in order to
raise the weights as shown.
Bessler
shows how the weights are connected together with the two letter
A's. You will see this relationship a numerous times in the
following pages.
There
are springs in Bessler's wheel. On this drawing most people look at
the springs that are stretched out around the top and right of the
axle thinking the springs are pulling up the arm that follows. The
less obvious but more important thing to look at is the bottom where
the two springs are compressed. The next arm to the left is
slightly lifted. The spring appears to be compressed very hard for
a short period of the rotation and its pushing travel is limited to
a few degrees of lift before the line becomes broken.
Bessler
says this IS the previous drawing but still not quite right. The
principle being demonstrated is that the arms sagging down and
backward for a time of the rotation does not help but it does not
hurt either, which is counter to personal experience. Then he gives a cryptic hint that the drawing tells
more than it shows but he will show more than tell later.
The
subject of sagging arms continues.
The
second decade and in the text he suggests moving the smaller
weighted arm to get the horse before the cart. The long arm being
the horse and the short arm being the cart. The A's in number
sixteen would fulfill the concept quite well.
Bessler
states the obvious that the arm at the lower left C in the drawing
would not fall in so soon....... but what if it had a compressed
spring like number seventeen and a triggered latch from the twins or
Secunda to release it at the right time and pop it up? They both
appear to be at the same approximate part of the rotation. I really
don't have a lot of faith in this configuration but I promised to
expose all my thoughts.
This
is a very tough read but it does not seem to be anything terribly
important that isn't made up for later.
He
kind of blows this one off too, but twenty-one through twenty-three
do seem to be grouped together.
This
drawing and the one that follows are very mega important diagrams.
Hinged metal rods not rope are between the solid wall and the moving
weighted arm and since the rods are solid they could also be used to
push. He says there is more to tell about the drawing.
The
longer rods appear to be an improvement but they must not be allowed
to make a straight line as shown on the right side of the drawing.
Even though it must be changed a lot but again he punctuates this
drawings importance with the strong and somewhat defiant expression,
“Mark my words.”
Bessler
introduces the sliding weights in a new configuration but now they
are sliding sideways not vertically. Drawings numbered twenty-four
through twenty-seven are possibly more about the one-way wheel. The
line from the left weighted hinge B to the rim hinge point of D is
hyper extended toward center and B would have to be a tremendously
greater weight to even make it a straight line.
Very
similar to the previous drawing except maybe a little more
practical. Bessler flaunts the thought of multiple units on an axle
but I think its more jokingly.
The
drawing and some of the text appears to be a bit of a red herring
allowing Bessler to quietly say at the end of the paragraph that the
resulting torque on the wheel is much greater than the force
required to lift the weights.
Bessler
appears to be saying that the two-way wheel above delivers four
times the torque to the rim of the wheel than is required to lift
the weights and on this one-way wheel only two times the force
required to lift the weight is delivered as torque on the wheel.
Here
we are at the third decade and quite a long description. It is an
introduction of how the pivot point for the small weighted arm is
oriented in respect to the main axle. The drawing also has a handle
operated by a hand, a likely follow up from number ten.
This
is a combination of some of the previous concepts and there is more
to the wheel but this drawing only shows the problem. The problem
most likely is the efficient lifting of the upper and lower weights.
He
keeps developing the idea of long weighted arms lifting short
weighted arms.
Again.
And
again
Even
if the long arms in the above drawings are “lifting” the
short arms this drawing demonstrates that there may also be a
squeeze that is applied that may assist in lifting the weights.
This
drawing is an either or both thing. The latches at the top and
bottom could easily relate back to the locks in the twins. The
implied result being that the lifting arms will so much overwhelm the short
arms that the action must be delayed until the right time in the
rotation. The other thing is the inset drawing to the upper left.
The short arm appears to have a rectangular mounting bracket at its
base that surrounds a square board. If the weighted arm ever
achieves a hanging orientation the weight would be even harder to
lift if done by turning the square board. It must be important
however because Bessler went to the trouble of carving it out and
inviting the reader to gather as much information as possible.
A
perfectionist doesn't just happen to misplace a drawing within a
book as he states. This drawing demonstrates that there is likely a
spring interconnecting the top and bottom weights together. The
thing that is odd is that only two of the six springs are stretched.
The ones at the nine o'clock and ten-thirty positions yet the arm
at the seven o'clock position is being pulled farther than gravity
would dictate. Bessler says the correct springs or location are
hard to find. One final note this drawing does fit in with numbers
fourteen through sixteen and if you add twenty to the fourteen
through sixteen it would be followed by thirty-seven through
thirty-nine so this may be a continuation of the former numbers.
Bessler
introduces the lazy tong device and it too is in between the top and
bottom weights. He says there is more to this invention than the
previous one but the correct application is not shown yet.
Another
tong device and I wonder if it is more related to the squeeze or the
lift because one weight falls as another is lifted. This drawing is
interesting because the left side weight sliding horizontally would
much easier than vertically lifting one, however it would have to be
lifted uphill at some point to return to the rim at the top.
The
fourth decade and a significant number in the Hebrew number system.
Oh, look, another handle. The sliding weights on the horizontal
board in this figure are a mystery but could be related to parts
found in drawing thirty-eight. Bessler doesn't mention them but
again there has to be something to it and it may be related to the
previously introduced squeeze.
Right
away we have a squeeze model again and the sliders are vertical. He
states that the tongs are very important and how they operate better
in the horizontal aspect than the vertical. There is a discrepancy
between translations so at this point the tongs either ARE or ARE
NOT the exact correct artistic application.
Again
the squeeze seems to be an important element. The inset drawing is
unique to say the least. Though it is difficult to see the multiple
ring weights at the top and bottom are connected as pairs by rods.
The center most connecting rod goes to the closest pair of weights.
As you go outward to the next pairs of rods you also go up to the
next weight not unlike the steps of the twins stampers going up each
step.
I
have studied this one carefully just in case, but there is nothing
here except it is an effective transition to what follows.
Bessler
is slyly showing us something about the two different types of
wheels in this and the following drawing and he does it again a
little later. This is the two-way wheel and the only thing I see is
the high gear ratio of the driving wheel against the driven one. It
is interesting that the angles of the increased weight at the top
and loss at the bottom closely coincide with the depiction in number
fifteen.
This
is the one way wheel and again the angles of effective weight
increase and loss are shown on the big wheel. Now you know why the
two-way wheel has twice the torque per pound.
I
don't know what to make of this drawing. A feeling says it holds
something valuable but I don't see it. It has the ladder element
with the balls wobbling left and right that is very similar to
number six, the next drawing and elsewhere.
Bessler
takes you all around the page and drops you off at the letter K and
says “the rest of this machine” is very important. The
rest that is left is the spring that appears to aid the tongs for
the beginning of their travel upward like what we saw in number
seventeen. The ladder element is here on the face of the wheel.
Speaking of springs seventeen, plus twenty is thirty-seven, then to
forty-seven... is that a pattern? Twenty-seven appears to have
been skipped in the pattern. This is also the only drawing with its
number anyplace other than in a separate box that is external to the
machine.
This
is the one-way wheel with a square axle and idler pulley like number
thirty-six.
This
is the two-way wheel with square axles at top and bottom.
Another
drawing with square axles with something new is introduced. The
center section C flips out to hold the arms out while the square
axle is in the diamond shape. I don't know why or how this really
works but it seems to be a big deal too. Could be related to the
locks and latches from the twins and Secunda.
Bessler
introduces a ratchet type mechanism that also appears to be very
important.
Bessler
explains that the wheel is not driven by heavy blows from a hammer
weight. He may have made his wheel to be loud to draw attention of
crowds. It is important to note that the loud banging was only associated with
the two-way wheel. The one way wheel was reported to make scratching
noises like stick rubbing.
For
all of the interconnecting arms that wrap up and over the top of the
figure, Bessler says it is lever G that lifts the weight.
This
is the last page with any meaningful text except for the 'Toys Page'
and a couple of notes close to the end of the book. The squeeze
concept is uniquely devised. Should be the two-way wheel with the
tongs lifting the weight. Note the tongs are horizontal like
forty-one. Is this the exact correct application?
This
top figure suggests the weight is lifted with a device that is not
permanently attached to the weighted arm and/or showing a specific
gear ratio between lifting forces and the load. The figure at the
bottom may be associated with how the spring gives the weight a flip
start in its path being raised.
The
main thing I see here is the squeeze is now coming from the wheel
like in drawing fifty-four. This is also the first drawing that
depict anything other than solid physical weights.
Through
59 are fill.
This
is the sixth decade. This drawing attracts attention because of the
sudden uniqueness and precision of this and sixty-one.
This figure suggests the idea of a constant tension
between all of the arms either with ropes and or springs or both.
See
above and the items labeled D are similar to the sliders in drawing
number forty.
through
86.Mostly fill. Bessler repeats themes of sliding weights and long
arms lifting weights more or less in the number sixteen
configuration of the A's, square axles. Seventy through seventy-two
are interesting. Eighty stands alone from anything on either side of eighty-one has the NB.
87. through 89. All have
handles. Eighty-eight is the only one with a balanced load and is
the only one whose handle is moved back and forth instead of up and
down.
90.The ninth decade. This
drawing also has uniquely better craftsmanship compared to drawings
on either side. Gearing ratios, long arm, short arm size ratio.
And just how does the water get from the pumps on the
ends get to the wheel to flow out the bottom?
91.Even though totally
impossible this drawing is interesting. The suspension bracket from
the ceiling so it could slide up and down the sharp hook shape that
was seen in numbers fifty-six at the end of the bellows, sixty-one
between the wheels, ninety-two, one hundred eighteen, one hundred
twenty-two, and one hundred thirty-seven.
92.through 95 hold little
interest at this point.
96.Has the NB and the
signature weighted arm. The two wheels at the left are the top and
bottom weights yielding output energy.
97.This drawing again
shows what part of the rotation the one-way wheel lifts its weight
and where it drops out of the effective range again.
98.Signature pendulums
and the energy flow path through the one-way wheel.
99.The flow of energy in
the two-way wheel.
100.This is the most
artistic rendition from here to the end of the book and the tenth
century mark. I also get the feeling that from here to the end of
the book is what Bessler referred to as showing more than telling in
the end. This drawing is the two way wheel and is showing that the
short arm turns perpendicular to the main axle.
101.The one-way wheel
small wheel same axis of the axle
102.One-way wheel because
of where the water enters and exits the wheels. The interesting
thing is that the spokes of the wheels rotate clockwise one hundred
and thirty-five degrees as you go from top right to bottom left. The
wheel actually bobs backward in the fifth wheel. The arms that
interconnect the seven wheels are separate short arms so they do not
interfere with positioning of the spokes. Also note the lever arms
at the top to the two single pumps. Their difference is size
suggests that the one pump has more positive influence than the other
side.

103.This is the two-way
wheel because of the water in and out. There are three sets of four
wheels with each side rotating in the opposite direction. The first
two wheels are the most important with the left one moving upward and
attached with a rather conspicuous looking hook. The slightly lower
right wheel is attached with a totally different type of arm and it
is moving downward. This second wheel is half way to the bottom of
its travel yet the shaft to the pump above it is still fully in
contact with the ceiling. The double pumps at either side are
another clue that tie this drawing to the two way wheel.
To get a clearer picture
of this drawing take part of the right hand wheel and mirror it
horizontally and place it on the left wheel as above. Another thing
is the hand drawn sketch to the right with square axles. It looks to
be in Bessler's own hand. This hand sketch would most likely have
been a permanent addition to the final edition of this book.
104.This is the last
officially numbered page most everything else is hand numbered. The
rest of the pages have a black rectangle to carve out the page
numbers for the final printing. There appears to also be a couple of
drawings Bessler wanted to also include that he sketched in on the
backs of other pages that are not even in the hand numbered sequence.
This drawing might be trying to show additional detail of the
linkage of the two way wheel that could not be shown in number one
hundred three.
105.There have been a few
roller arms like number fifty-six and always wondered if they were
related to the squeeze.
106.This is the first of
three quietly important drawings. This is the one-way wheel and C is
the angle where the weight is lifted whether the wheel is creeping
forward or running full tilt. Notice that the water line or balance
line is a little above the axle.
107. This is the
stationary two-way wheel with a balance level just below the axle
108.This is the running
two-way wheel. Its center of gravity is nearly at the top.
109.Fill.
110.Square axles and a
narrow board block in the middle and possibly a slider from forty in
the center.
111.Hidden axles but
apparently time passes with a wide block in the middle. The weights
in the cones on the right side appear to be broken into two pieces.
The weights on the left side look like cone shaped buckets being
carried up.
112.Cones inside the
chain can open, as well as, the outside ones in the previous two
drawings because the block in the middle is gone. This happens when
the square axles are diamond shaped and it contradicts what was seen
in drawing fifty. At the bottom of this figure there is also a
curious ball weight on the end of the cone at D.
113.Upside down is
another reversal of dubious thirteen. I believe the drawing is right
side up and just the letters are inverted. Since the rising short
arms on the real wheel fold up sideways he is just showing that the
arms do NOT hang down or fold backward to the rotation of the wheel.
114.See number one
hundred eight.
115.See one hundred
seven.
116.Hyperbole.
117.Believe it or not I
found this drawing fascinating after bypassing it hundreds of times.
The device to the right has three tubes running up and one down. If
this is the two-way wheel this may be involved with the cryptic
center of the measuring stick in the DT twin. Even if three
stampers are raised as steps. One of them still has to be at the
bottom.
The
left side of the drawing is one tube or stamper up and one tube down. The
two G balls are maybe acting as one and the H balls are acting
independently. This looks to be representing the one way-wheel.
118.The eight weights of
the two-way wheel are represented by the eight sharply angled tubes
as described in number ninety-one. The tubes are balanced on each
side and the top two tubes combine into one. They all work together
to contribute to the flow of downward or forward motion of the big
arrow.
119.The two way wheel has
two springs per weight/arm/stamper.
120.The one way wheel has
one spring per whatever.
121.The two way wheel
just because it is more complicated.
122.The one-way wheel for
its simplicity. The pumper arms at the top and the part that hangs
down to E looks a lot like a balance scale common to the period.
123.The one-way wheel
because similarity to the weight in Secunda. This shows that when
the weight moves it swings nearly one hundred eighty degrees.
124.This shows the paths
of the two individual weights on the two-way wheel. The ladder figure
and the ratchet figures are attached.
125. and 127 all seem to
be one particular wheel.
128. and 129.seem to be
the other wheel. Notice the blocks at the upper left and lower right
of the figure to the far right.
130.to 132. are anybody's
guess.
133. One of the more
fascinating drawings. This is the one way wheel. The bottom inset
shows that the long arms extend from one rim to the other where the
weighted short arms will be connected to the ends. The weights
around the full circle wheel is a conundrum in itself. If the
weights are cross connected the weighted arms as shown don't line up
as being truly across from each other as it appears in the drawing.
Below is the wheel numbered as they would have to be as shown in red.
It is rather odd that Bessler chose thirty-four instead of
thirty-six intervals so I will suggest the possibility that the
weights may occupy a particular position twice. That could fix the
discrepancy of the opposing arms being connected two different
numbered weights and it would fit with drawing one hundred two quite
nicely.

134. This is the two-way
wheel. The bottom inset shows that the long arms are mounted on the
center wooden axle shaft with an extra corner hinged framework. Very
ratchet like teeth adorn the weights on the outer rim. The full
wheel on the drawing depicts that the arms at the three and nine
o'clock positions lift the weights at the six and twelve o'clock
positions.
134A.This is the first of
two hand made sketches that Bessler would have likely made permanent
drawings in the final version to this book. A curious thing worth
studying it seems to have originated from the lamp black that rubbed
off of the facing page of drawing one hundred thirty-five. It
features a long arm from rim to rim with pendulum weights that are
rotating while suspended on sticks extending from the bottom of the
long arm. Not sure what it really means but the long arms line up
with arms on the next drawing.
135. Back to the theme of
the sliding weights and here the stampers slide through the wooden
shaft.
135A.The second hand made
sketch. The text at the top gives a hint of this drawings
importance. The characteristics demonstrated here are quite
fascinating when you analyze it. The three pairs of weights that are
geared together have the unique property of requiring very little
effort to change the weights positions. As one weight is lifted the
other equally falls giving them a balance of forces. Even if the
individual weights were several tons each the force required to move
them would be entirely attributed to the friction in the bearings at
the pivot points.
The
corner hinged rectangle frame that is mounted through the center
vertical post is in many ways similar to drawing one hundred
thirty-four and is another unique physics demonstration. The two
sides of the rectangle can also be raised and lowered regardless of
the position of the two sets of geared arms in spite of the apparent
overbalance on the right. The effective total weight is actually
equally distributed. On the other hand, if the foot stand at the
bottom is not wide enough the whole stand would fall over to the
right with the weights in their current positions.
136.This figure has the
signature pendulum weights. Most people see that the weights to the
top and right are further from the center but the center posts are
also moved and appear to be driven by springs near the axle of the
wheel.
137. This drawing has
been used by many people to support theories but I disagree with most
of their conclusions. Primarily what I see are sets of perpendicular
lines as seen in the drawing below.

138. through 141.The
famed “Toy Page” and again all about the two-way wheel.
The figures on the right are the set up for the rest of the page. Both
figures A and B have equally spaced sets of balls up and down their
sticks. In figure A all of the balls are on the left side because of
the opening and closing of the mechanism. B is simply a timing
record with the balls on one side representing the top of the wheel
and the other side the bottom. Figures C and D are attached to
figure B at certain places in the timing marks. C is attached at the
top or bottom and D is attached midway between the top and bottom. C
and D would necessarily be perpendicular to each other. Both C and D
are also attached to the lazy tongs on the left and this provides
information about the leverage or directional movement as attachment
points.
The
angles at the top of B are likely of great importance.
The
hand sketched figure at the bottom is a toy top. I have seen and
played with similar ones as a kid. Bessler added the toy top to
demonstrate that a heavy weight can be lifted of its own accord. In
this particular circumstance it is the centrifugal forces and the
shapes at each end that push the weight upward rather than a
mechanical arrangement of separate weights on the wheel.
Click
hereto go to: Summary.
You
can send email or suggestions to: me @ mikeyned.com.
Copyright
©: All rights reserved
|